![]() I think this also gives a pretty good explanation of what " cherry-pick -squash" will do: it really is the analog of the " merge -squash", but for cherry-pick. This allows you to fix the merge conflicts in one go, shows the entire files causing the conflicts, and allows you to edit the commit message, starting with the descriptions of all the squashed commits. Using cherry pick it is easy: checkout first branch cherry-pick one by one c to f and rebase second branch onto first. It takes the patch that was introduced in a commit and tries to reapply it on the branch youre. I want to move c, d, e and f to first branch without commit b. A cherry-pick is like a rebase for a single commit. Git cherry-pick -edit # cherry-pick the squashed commit A.B Commit a is the head of one, while the other has b, c, d, e and f on top of a. # This is not exact, as you're in detached HEAD state. Git checkout # Go back to where we were at the beginning. I think that the best way to do what I want using the existing commands is: git checkout A It also requires manual editing for every commit between A and B. Instead of fixing all conflicts at once, treating the change from A to My main problem with using " rebase -i" is that it would require me toįix merge conflicts one by one, on each commit in which they appear, Push the Changes to the Temporary Branch on Remote (Optional but recommended): git push origin hotfix-cherry-pick 7. Continue the cherry-pick process: git cherry-pick - continue 6. After resolving conflicts, stage the changes: git add. ![]() $ git checkout Noam Yorav-Raphael objects: Resolve Any Conflicts: If there are merge conflicts, manually resolve them. $ git checkout -B if I don't, perhaps because I made mistakes, then I can just discard it and go back to the original branch. If I like the result, I may update the branch I was originally on with it. That will give me one single chance to edit a single commit message, but the editor buffer starts with the log message from all of the original, so I can pick good bits from them while writing new stuff. Then if my goal is to squash everything down into a single commit, then replace all 'pick', except for the first one, to 'squash'. To transplant the range A.B of the history on top of HEAD, for example, I'd start with (notice ^0 after B, as I do not trust myself so I'd leave the true branch B untouched as I may make mistakes while running rebase): $ git checkout -detach HEAD # this is only to use later ![]() Johannes Sixt suggests an interractive rebase When using " git cherry-pick" and there are conflicts, you can see the change in the context of the entire file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |